ArticleMycorrhiza2025
Transcriptomic evidence of interspecies systemic resistance induction via common mycorrhizal networks.
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants face persistent biotic pressures from pathogens and herbivores, necessitating effective defense mechanisms. Common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs), formed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, facilitate inter-plant defense signal transmission. However, little is known about interspecies signal transmission through CMNs. This study aimed to investigate whether defense signals can be transferred from pathogen-infected white clover (Trifolium repens) to neighboring healthy perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) via CMNs and to assess the subsequent activation of disease-resistance responses in ryegrass at the transcriptional level. A dual-chamber experimental setup was used, in which white clover served as the donor plant and perennial ryegrass was the receiver plant. The results showed that pathogen-induced defense signals can be transferred from infected donor clover to healthy ryegrass plants through CMNs, inducing the expression of resistance genes in the neighboring plants, especially TRINITY_DN52759_c0_g1 (disease resistance protein RGA2). Importantly, the upregulated expression of defense genes was closely related to CAT activity. These factors enhance the defense response of neighboring healthy plants against potential pathogens. Although the pathogenic microbe evaluated is non-pathogenic to ryegrass, the signal transmission mechanism may apply to scenarios with shared threats. In addition, we identified gene modules significantly associated with CAT through weighted gene co-expression network analysis and screened key network genes (TRINITY_DN29267_c0_g1, TRINITY_DN37961_c0_g1, TRINITY_DN74958_c0_g2, TRINITY_DN7515_c0_g1, TRINITY_DN7587_c0_g6) in co-expression networks, which potentially play critical roles in defense responses. The findings suggest that CMNs serve as vital conduits for interplant defense signal transfer, facilitating early warning and defense activation against potential pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40996578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.