ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025
Using eDNA as a viable fish monitoring approach in Northern Gulf estuarine habitats.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) has become an important tool for studying fish presence or absence in aquatic systems. eDNA metabarcoding has been shown to produce fish diversity results comparable to traditional surveys. Environmental factors may influence the detection of fish species and estuarine applications of eDNA methodologies are more limited relative to studies in freshwater systems. In this study, we adapt existing approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of eDNA metabarcoding of fish species in two estuarine systems located in the northwest Florida Panhandle and southwestern Alabama. Sites were located in four distinct estuarine habitats for optimum representation of species present within the study area. In November 2022, mid-water samples were collected using aseptic protocols. Water samples were filtered at the end of the collection day and stored at -70 °C until filtered DNA was extracted, amplified, and sequenced. A set of universal primers was used to amplify DNA material in collected samples. The reference DNA library was amassed using contributed fish species data from national and local resource management programs. Results yielded the identification of 58 fish species, 10 distinct genera, and 13 distinct families. Greater than 80% of identified taxa were characteristic species of the estuarine systems. Eighteen of detected species were freshwater fish known to periodically inhabit tidal marshes. Unexpected species represented less than 5% of all detected species and their presence was found plausible. While more research is needed, findings suggest that an eDNA metabarcoding approach may be adequately generalizable for measuring the prevalence of fish communities in estuarine environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.