ArticleBrain topography2025
EEG Microstates Signatures of rTMS Response Over the lDLPFC: A Band-Specific Analysis.
Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), particularly Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), is a non-invasive, non-convulsive neuromodulation technique that induces clinically relevant network modulations with long-term effects. Two TBS protocols- continuous TBS (cTBS) and intermittent TBS (iTBS)- have been approved as effective therapeutic interventions for neuropsychiatric disorders, including mood disorders. With this aim, we examined EEG microstate temporal dynamics during resting-state recordings across three sessions of TMS. Twenty-four participants underwent cTBS, iTBS, and sham stimulation in a pseudo-randomized order, each separated by at least one week. Six distinct microstates (A-F), associated with activity in specific neural networks, were identified across six frequency bands (broadband, δ, θ, α, β, and γ). Our findings reveal frequency band-specific modulation of EEG microstates B, C, E, and F, previously reported as biomarkers in mood disorders. Notably, C microstates showed increased stability, whereas microstates E and F showed decreased dynamics up to fifty-five minutes after TBS. Most importantly, a negative association was observed for microstate E occurrence, between before stimulation (pre-cTBS) and three post-standing time points (post1-cTBS, post2-cTBS, and post3-cTBS), suggesting that baseline microstate E characteristics may be related to individual variability in cTBS treatment response. These results further support the potential of TBS to induce clinically relevant neuroplastic changes, establishing a strong foundation for the development of band-specific EEG microstate markers for assessing treatment response and personalized closed-loop TMS-EEG protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.