Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996557›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025

Impact of vacuum assisted wound therapy on wound complications in STS surgery- A 3-year retrospective single-centre analysis.

Simone Schewe, Adrian Sagebiel, Jonas Wakker, Nina Voss, Ruba Al Shonikat, Matthias Priemel, Alonja Reiter, Jana Striefler, Marco Blessmann, Thilo Hackert and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simone ScheweDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. s.schewe@uke.de.
Adrian SagebielDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jonas WakkerDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Nina VossDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ruba Al ShonikatDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias PriemelClinic and Polyclinic for Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Alonja ReiterClinic and Polyclinic for Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jana Striefler2nd Medical Clinic and Polyclinic (Oncology, Hematology, Department of Pulmonology), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Marco BlessmannDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna DupréeDepartment of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn sarcomas, surgery is an essential component of therapy. Depending on their location, sarcomas can reach a considerable size, which increases the risk of wound complications (WC) after resections. This often results in longer hospital stays and thus delays further oncological treatment. Therefore, reducing WCs is indispensable for improving treatment. The VAC (Vacuum-Assisted Closure) therapy has been shown to have a positive effect on wound healing, but there are limited studies for its use after sarcoma resections. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of various wound closure techniques. This was intended to identify optimal wound care to prevent WCs and to determine risk factors for complications.

methodsThis study is a single-center study that included all patients who underwent surgery for sarcomas of the body surface and extremities. A retrospective data analysis was conducted for the years 2021-2023. The primary endpoint was the development of wound complications. Here, primary wound closure was compared with secondary closure after negative wound pressure therapy (NWPT). Secondary endpoints included the impact of drains, subtype, location, and comorbidities.

resultsA total of 211 patients were examined. The most common histological subtype was liposarcoma (32,88%), followed by undifferentiated sarcoma (19,18%). Wound complications occurred in 30,19% of all cases. The analysis showed that 40,4% of patients with primary wound closure developed a complication, while only 20% of patients with NWPT did. A significant risk factor for the development of a WC was a tumor diameter > 10 cm, which led to a 20,13% higher risk of infection compared to smaller tumors. 68.3% of wound complications occurred in the lower extremity. Additionally, neoadjuvant therapy, longer operation time and immunosuppression were detected as risk factors for a higher complication rate.

conclusionsThis study highlights the significantly increased risk of WCs in large sarcomas of the lower extremities. VAC therapy showed a significant improvement in wound closure especially in high-risk cases. Based on the results, the use of NWPT can be essential for wound management in sarcomas and improve convalescence and oncological treatment.

Indexed as

Negative-Pressure Wound TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsSurgical Wound InfectionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeWound HealingPostoperative complicationsSarcoma surgerySecondary wound closureSoft tissue sarcomaVacuum assisted wound closureWound complication

Identifiers

PMID40996557
PMCPMC12464026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.