ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Forming capability of advanced customized jetting additive manufacturing for restorations with different margin morphologies and surface textures.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Printed Materials for Definitive Ceramic and Resin Restorations: A Scoping Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to investigate the forming capability of Advanced Customized Jetting (ACJ) technology for four different margin types restorations and five surface textures. MATERIALS AND
methodsZirconia restorations with four margin types (heavy-chamfer, chamfer, shoulder and biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT)) were fabricated using CAD/CAM and ACJ technology (n = 10), then compared the root mean square (RMS) at non-marginal and Marginal regions. Surface textures were designed on 5 mm×5 mm× 5 mm cubes, including 11 groups: 1 non-porous (NP) group and 10 experimental groups with circular, triangular, square, pentagram, or hexagonal textures at 400 μm (D
results(1) All ACJ restorations have lower RMS values at non-marginal regions than CAD/CAM (P < 0.01). ACJ fabricated heavy-chamfer, chamfer and BOPT restorations have lower RMS values at marginal region than CAD/CAM (P < 0.01), whereas no difference in shoulder (P > 0.05). (2) Circle and hexagon have the highest accuracy: D
conclusionsACJ restorations exhibited lower RMS values than CAD/CAM in both non-marginal region and marginal region with heavy-chamfer, chamfer, and BOPT margins. Circle textures have the highest accuracy and larger aperture improves printing accuracy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ACJ fabricated zirconia restorations exhibit higher geometric precision and demonstrate technical feasibility in manufacturing customized morphological features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40996555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.