ArticleDysphagia2026
Evaluation of Swallowing Function and Aspiration in Newly Diagnosed Head and Neck Cancer Patients.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Swallowing difficulties are common in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, significantly affecting nutrition and quality of life. Early identification of risk factors is essential for timely intervention. A retrospective analysis of 244 newly diagnosed HNC patients was conducted. Swallowing function was assessed using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) alongside subjective measures, including the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). PAS served as the gold standard for identifying aspiration risk factors. Aspiration events, defined as a PAS score of ≥ 6, varied by tumor site. The highest rate of aspiration events was observed in patients with hypopharyngeal cancers (35%), followed by oropharyngeal (24%), oral cavity (12%), and laryngeal cancers (11%). Notably, no aspiration events were identified in cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identify age, BMI and tumor site as independent predictors of aspiration. A prediction model was then created as follows: Score = (0.060 × Age) - (0.120 × BMI) + 1.587 (if tumor site is oral cavity) + 1.915 (if tumor site is oropharynx) + 2.425 (if tumor site is hypopharynx) + 0 (if tumor site is larynx, nasopharynx, or other sites) - 5.552. This model achieved an AUC of 0.78, with an optimal cutoff score of -2.15, yielding a sensitivity of 45%, specificity of 93%, and accuracy of 86% for predicting aspiration risk. This research highlights the multifactorial nature of dysphagia in HNC patients and introduces a predictive model for aspiration risk. Early identification of high-risk patients enables timely swallowing evaluations and interventions, improving safety and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40996518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.