ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2025
NCBI Orthologs: Public Resource and Scalable Method for Computing High-Precision Orthologs Across Eukaryotic Genomes.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking Genetic Risk to Disease-Relevant Cellular States via Metacell-Informed Modeling with ICePop.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Integrated Symbiotic Pleiotropy: Long Non-Coding RNAs and Disordered Proteins Interweaving the Functional Layers of the Eukaryotic Cell.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Positive Selection Targeted Primate Genes that Encode Transposable Element Repressors.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Boundary-associated propagation of a processed pseudogene dissects pre-existing limitations of genome annotation in the T2T era.Mobile DNA · 2026Article
- Perspectives on Orthology During the Quest for Orthologs.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Article
- The complete genome of a songbird.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthologs are fundamental for enabling comparative genomics analyses that further our understanding of eukaryotic biology. The unprecedented increase in the availability of high-quality eukaryotic genomes necessitates scalable and accurate methods for orthology inference. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) developed "NCBI Orthologs", a resource and a computational pipeline designed to meet this challenge within the NCBI RefSeq framework. This system integrates protein similarity, nucleotide alignment, and microsynteny to achieve high-precision ortholog assignments across diverse eukaryotes. The pipeline leverages high-quality RefSeq annotations and processes genomes individually, ensuring scalability. Resulting ortholog data, organized into gene-level anchored sets, enables propagation of functional annotation information and facilitates comparative genomics. Critically, these data are integrated into the NCBI Gene resource, providing users with access from various entry points. The NCBI Datasets resource provides an intuitive interface to explore orthologous relationships on the web and allows bulk data download via the web, command-line tools, and an API. We detail the methodology, including anchor species selection and the decision tree used to arrive at high-confidence one-to-one orthology relationships. NCBI Orthologs is a valuable resource for facilitating functional annotation efforts and enhancing our understanding of eukaryotic gene evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.