ArticleHerz2025
[Deactivation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) at the end of life].
Article in Herz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to one third of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) experience shock discharges in the last 24 h before death, which no longer have any therapeutic benefit. Even in patients who have a living will (do not resuscitate, DNR, directive), the shock function of the ICD is activated in over 50% of those affected 24 h before death. A significant subgroup of ICD wearers must therefore experience painful, significantly stressful and unnecessary ICD shocks at the hour of their death. All available position papers on this topic call for patients to be informed about this issue in good time; however, in reality such a conversation almost never takes place. This paper outlines the legal basis that helps doctors to deactivate the ICD in the final stage of life and the specific conditions that must be met. This paper advocates repeatedly addressing the issue during the course of the illness and to involve relatives. The actual conversation about deactivation at the end of life should be proactively initiated by the responsible attending physician and should take the form of a structured, patient-centered dialogue in the spirit of good dialogue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40996495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.