ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: criteria for first-line therapeutic choice-an opinion paper.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent leukemia in the Western World, with 70% of patients asymptomatic at diagnosis. Treatment initiation follows specific criteria, including evidence of active disease. Recent advancements in Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors like acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib offer improved efficacy and safety profiles, impacting treatment choice for all patients namely elderly patients with comorbidities. In this opinion paper, a panel of experienced hematologists sought to establish criteria for selecting therapy in CLL and examine how the introduction of second-generation BTK inhibitors will influence these criteria. Experts recommend prioritizing criteria for CLL treatment selection: cytogenetics, comorbidities, age, socioeconomic factors, and patient preferences. Assessing IGHV mutational status, del(17p), and TP53 mutation is crucial for predicting treatment response, with repeat assessments for the latter before each retreatment. Comorbidities and patient well-being, including literacy, adherence, and living conditions, should be considered. Age alone should not limit treatment options; a holistic approach is needed, including geriatric evaluation. Patient involvement in treatment decisions is vital, considering treatment comprehension, toxicity, and individual preferences. New-generation BTK inhibitors offer improved efficacy and lower toxicity, particularly beneficial for patients with multiple comorbidities, including cardiovascular conditions. In conclusion, in the era of targeted therapies, treating elderly and multimorbid CLL patients requires balancing safety and efficacy, considering quality of life and life expectancy. Targeted therapy is preferred for most patients, with geriatric assessment pivotal for treatment decisions. Second-generation drugs aim to improve outcomes both in efficacy and safety, advocating for a patient-centered approach in clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40996474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.