ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025
Role of endoscopic ultrasound in diagnosis and management of autoimmune pancreatitis.
Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type 3 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: What Do We Know So Far?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Multifocal Autoimmune Pancreatitis Mimicking Pancreatic Neoplasm in a Young Adult: A Diagnostic Challenge.Cureus · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in chronic and autoimmune pancreatitis: diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized management.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare inflammatory disorder of the pancreas, often mistaken for pancreatic cancer. Despite definitive diagnostic criteria such as histology, imaging, serology, other organ involvement and response to therapy (HISORt), International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) and Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) criteria being available for AIP, making a diagnosis of AIP remain a rarity in the evaluation of a pancreatic mass or distal bile duct obstruction. A significant proportion of patients are diagnosed only after surgical resection. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the main modality for establishing diagnosis of AIP. Considering the rarity of the disease, there are no classical findings on EUS associated with AIP. Histopathology remains the crux for diagnosing AIP with need for EUS-guided sampling. Both focal and diffuse forms of AIP are described with different EUS findings in both. The focal form mimics pancreatic cancer closely. The disease is also known to have extra-pancreatic involvement with cholangiopathy also seen often in association. Diffuse involvement of the pancreas is unusual and may be rarely seen with diffuse pancreatic infiltrative diseases. The primary consideration remains differentiating AIP from carcinoma of pancreas, where EUS plays a significant role. Adjunct techniques such as EUS-guided elastography and contrast harmonic EUS can add value in diagnosing AIP. Advances in tissue sampling, including availability of better needles for core biopsy, have aided in improving the diagnostic yield of AIP. In this narrative review, we aim to highlight the increasing role of EUS for establishing diagnosis of AIP while elaborating its role in evaluation, sampling and therapeutic monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.