Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996404›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2025

Leadless Pacing and Cardioversion: Power On or Power Off?

Roland Tilz, Julius Nikorowitsch, Anna Traub

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roland TilzDepartment of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Lübeck, Germany.
Julius NikorowitschDepartment of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK), Lübeck, Germany.
Anna TraubDepartment of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany. Electronic address: anna.traub@uksh.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial leadless pacemakers have recently been introduced as an alternative to conventional systems. CASE SUMMARY: An 86-year-old patient with sinus node dysfunction received a leadless atrial pacemaker. After cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation, device interrogation indicated an unexpectedly short battery longevity of only 9 months, despite minimal pacing. Repeat interrogation after 7 days demonstrated recovery of battery life to 6.1 years, suggesting a transient miscalculation. DISCUSSION: This case demonstrates that electromagnetic interference from electrical cardioversion can induce a power-on reset (PoR) mode in the Aveir AR pacemaker (Abbott), accompanied by a reset alert. Although PoR briefly interrupts device function, the system resumes normal operation within seconds, retaining programmed settings without reverting to safety mode or requiring reprogramming. Such transient resets may cause false estimates of battery depletion but do not reflect true malfunction. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: PoR after cardioversion can transiently alter battery readings, but settings recover automatically. Recognizing PoR helps avoid misinterpretation and unnecessary interventions.

Indexed as

Aveir ARcardioversionleadless pacingLPPoRpower-on reset

Identifiers

PMID40996404
PMCPMC12790227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.