ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of community pharmacy services in the European Union and beyond: a cross-country survey of 33 national pharmacy organisations.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Role of pharmacists in HIV prophylaxis: a scoping review of pharmacists' services, interventions and outcomes.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Reshaping Smart Pharmacy in TCM Hospitals via High-Reliability Organization Theory.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleThe implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in healthcare systems is multifactorial and complex. Some studies summarize the implementation research of these services in both outpatient and inpatient contexts. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis to understand how the implementation process occurs in Primary Health Care.
aimTo map, at an international level, the studies on the implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care.
methodThis scoping review followed the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search was conducted in May 2023 across six electronic databases, grey literature, and the references of the selected studies. Original studies that described the implementation process of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently assessed the studies based on eligibility criteria and extracted data from the selected articles. Data were presented descriptively.
resultsA total of 97 studies were included, with 85.6% (n = 83) conducted in developed countries. A significant emphasis was observed on qualitative and mixed-methods research, accounting for 46.4% (n = 45) of the studies. Only 22.7% (n = 22) of the studies utilized theoretical models as research guides, while 96.9% (n = 94), did not report on the implementation phase. Comprehensive Medication Management (36.8%, n = 35) was the most cited type of service. The most assessed implementation outcome was feasibility, at 73.2% (n = 71). A total of 47.4% (n = 46) assessed outcomes related to the implemented service, which included clinical, economic, and/or humanistic aspects.
conclusionThis study revealed numerous publications on the implementation of clinical services provided by pharmacists in primary care. These findings can guide future research on the implementation of these services and highlight the need for developing and underdeveloped countries to explore this topic further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.