Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996324›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025

Implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review.

João Pedro Vasconcelos Paolinelli, Taiana de Alencar, Kérilin Stancine Santos Rocha, Mariana Linhares Pereira, Genival Araujo Dos Santos Júnior

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

João Pedro Vasconcelos PaolinelliGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Services and Policies, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Alegre-ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7981-6763
Taiana de AlencarGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Services and Policies, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Alegre-ES, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-1916-9633
Kérilin Stancine Santos RochaLaboratory of Innovation for Healthcare (Linc). Postgraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Assistance (PPGASFAR), Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2313-2140
Mariana Linhares PereiraFederal University of São João del - Rei, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-2789
Genival Araujo Dos Santos JúniorGraduate Program in Pharmaceutical Services and Policies, Federal University of Espirito Santo, Alegre-ES, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-1846

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in healthcare systems is multifactorial and complex. Some studies summarize the implementation research of these services in both outpatient and inpatient contexts. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis to understand how the implementation process occurs in Primary Health Care.

aimTo map, at an international level, the studies on the implementation of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care.

methodThis scoping review followed the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for Scoping Reviews. A systematic search was conducted in May 2023 across six electronic databases, grey literature, and the references of the selected studies. Original studies that described the implementation process of Clinical Pharmacy Services in Primary Health Care were eligible for inclusion. Two researchers independently assessed the studies based on eligibility criteria and extracted data from the selected articles. Data were presented descriptively.

resultsA total of 97 studies were included, with 85.6% (n = 83) conducted in developed countries. A significant emphasis was observed on qualitative and mixed-methods research, accounting for 46.4% (n = 45) of the studies. Only 22.7% (n = 22) of the studies utilized theoretical models as research guides, while 96.9% (n = 94), did not report on the implementation phase. Comprehensive Medication Management (36.8%, n = 35) was the most cited type of service. The most assessed implementation outcome was feasibility, at 73.2% (n = 71). A total of 47.4% (n = 46) assessed outcomes related to the implemented service, which included clinical, economic, and/or humanistic aspects.

conclusionThis study revealed numerous publications on the implementation of clinical services provided by pharmacists in primary care. These findings can guide future research on the implementation of these services and highlight the need for developing and underdeveloped countries to explore this topic further.

Indexed as

Pharmacy Service, HospitalPrimary Health CareHumansImplementation SciencePharmaceutical CarePharmaceutical ServicesPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID40996324
PMCPMC12462563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.