ReviewEuropean heart journal2026
Abnormal electrocardiogram findings in athletes.
Review in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise in Patients with Subclinical Atherosclerosis: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Practical Recommendations.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Programmed ventricular stimulation for risk stratification in symptomatic athletes with nonischemic left ventricular scar and preserved ejection fraction.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Echocardiography and Sports Cardiology: Expanding Horizons From Elite Athletes to Advanced Cardiovascular Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Sudden Death in Young Competitive Athletes Due to Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: A 4-Decade National Referral Center Experience.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2026Article
- COACH Study: COVID-19 Influence on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Athletes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Exercise Stress Testing in Clinical Cardiology: A Practical Guide to Performance and Interpretation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Critical appraisal on "automatic measuring of coronary atherosclerosis from medicolegal autopsy photographs based on deep learning techniques".Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
- [[Electrocardiogram in the pediatric athlete: physiological adaptations, borderline findings, and alarm criteria]].Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Athletes commonly exhibit a series of electrical, structural, and functional physiological changes which may overlap with cardiac pathology. The last two decades have witnessed a progressive improvement in understanding what can be considered benign for athletes and what may be deemed as potentially pathological and require further investigations. However, diagnostic uncertainties in the cardiac assessment of athletes are often encountered. In particular, the clinical significance of some electrocardiogram (ECG) findings may be uncertain. While uncommon and suggestive of an underlying cardiac condition, they may be identified among healthy athletes without additional pathological findings to support a unifying clinical diagnosis. This creates significant dilemmas for clinicians charged with determining sports eligibility and those who have the responsibility to help athletes in the decision-making process regarding future competitive sports participation. Current guidelines, recommendations, and position papers provide a roadmap for the differential diagnosis between 'athlete's heart' and cardiac disease. However, managing ECG findings of uncertain clinical significance, especially when initial diagnostic evaluation reveals no supportive signs of pathology, has received comparatively less attention, in particular, the type of cardiac investigations, the extent of diagnostic work-up and the need for follow-up require clarification. This document aims to provide guidance based on published evidence and expert opinions to assist in the clinical decision-making regarding ECG anomalies that are common sources of uncertainty when managing asymptomatic athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.