Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996280›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

When two eyes are worse than one: Binocular summation for chromatic, interocular-anti-phase stimuli.

Frederick A A Kingdom, Xingao Clara Wang, Huayun Li, Yoel Yakobi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frederick A A KingdomMcGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Xingao Clara WangFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Huayun LiSchool of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University and Intelligent Laboratory of Zhejiang Province in Mental Health and Crisis Intervention for Children and Adolescents, Jinhua, China.
Yoel YakobiFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that sensitivity to binocular targets is higher than to its monocular components, a phenomenon known as binocular summation. Binocular summation has been demonstrated with luminance contrast targets that are not only interocularly in-phase, that is, identical in both eyes, but also interocularly anti-phase, that is, of opposite polarity in the two eyes. Here we show that for the detection of anti-phase targets defined along the red-cyan and violet-lime axes of cardinal color space two eyes are more often than not worse than one. We suggest this is because channels that detect interocular differences, or S- channels are relatively insensitive to chromatic stimuli. We tested this idea by measuring binocular summation for chromatic anti-phase targets in the context of a chromatic surround that itself was either interocularly in-phase or anti-phase. The anti-phase surrounds reduced even further binocular summation for the anti-phase targets whereas the in-phase surrounds increased the level of summation. We show that a model that combines via probability summation the independent activities of adding S+ and differencing S- channels gave a good account of the data, especially for the anti-phase targets. We conclude that binocular adding and differencing channels play an important role in binocular color vision.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionContrast SensitivityVision, BinocularHumansPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40996280
PMCPMC12477827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.