Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996248›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025

Decoding anaerobes: a comprehensive evaluation of MALDI-TOF Sirius and VITEK MS PRIME in clinical settings.

Maria Florencia Rocca, Paula Etcheverry, Gastón D Angiolo, Monica Prieto

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Florencia RoccaServicio Bacteriología Especial, Departamento de Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de enfermedades infecciosas, INEI-ANLIS "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán", Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2932-0537
Paula EtcheverryServicio Bacteriología Especial, Departamento de Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de enfermedades infecciosas, INEI-ANLIS "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gastón D AngioloServicio Bacteriología Especial, Departamento de Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de enfermedades infecciosas, INEI-ANLIS "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Monica PrietoServicio Bacteriología Especial, Departamento de Bacteriología, Instituto Nacional de enfermedades infecciosas, INEI-ANLIS "Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán", Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timely identification of anaerobic bacteria at the genus and species levels is critical for managing infections and guiding antimicrobial therapy. Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a powerful tool for the identification of anaerobic bacteria, overcoming challenges associated with their special culture requirements and low growth rates. This technique has proven to be both reliable and efficient, providing accurate identification with minimal bacterial biomass. The application of MALDI-TOF MS in clinical settings has significantly improved the identification of anaerobic bacteria, facilitating appropriate treatment decisions and enhancing patient outcomes with minor costs. This study evaluates the performance of two MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry platforms: SIRIUS (Bruker Daltonics) and VITEK MS PRIME (bioMérieux), and their latest libraries, using a panel of 60 clinically relevant anaerobic strains validated in IVD databases and approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Beyond identification accuracy, we highlight the role of rapid confirmation of anaerobic pathogens in improving clinical outcomes. Results are compared against the existing literature, including performance evaluations of our group, to underscore the advancements in MALDI-TOF technology. MALDI-TOF MS has demonstrated high accuracy in identifying anaerobic bacteria, with a genus identification success rate of over 97%, combined with a precision value of 100% and an overall performance agreement of 73.3%, with some minor discrepancies, so the choice of one or the other platform will depend on the needs of each particular laboratory. IMPORTANCE Rapid and accurate identification of anaerobic bacteria is essential for guiding antimicrobial therapy and improving patient outcomes, yet it remains challenging due to the organisms' fastidious nature. Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry has transformed clinical microbiology by enabling high-throughput, cost-effective, and reliable identification of anaerobes. This study provides a head-to-head comparison of two widely used MALDI-TOF platforms-Bruker SIRIUS and VITEK MS PRIME-using a panel of clinically relevant anaerobic strains. By assessing their diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility, and database performance, our results offer practical insights for laboratories selecting a MALDI-TOF system. The findings have direct implications for improving diagnostic workflows, reducing time-to-result, and enhancing antimicrobial stewardship in clinical settings. Furthermore, this work contributes to the development of national resources and tools that support MALDI-TOF-based diagnostics in low- and middle-income settings.

Indexed as

Bacteria, AnaerobicBacterial InfectionsBacterial Typing TechniquesBacteriological TechniquesSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationHumansanaerobesclinical microbiologycomparative studiesMALDI-TOF

Identifiers

PMID40996248
PMCPMC12584683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.