Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40996148›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2025

Limb preservation with radical muscle debridement in crush-related compartment syndrome: a case report from an earthquake survivor.

Güven Ozan Kaplan, Süleyman Yıldızdal, Serdar Nasır

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Güven Ozan KaplanDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1167-269X
Süleyman YıldızdalDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8068-5430
Serdar NasırDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5168-288X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of fasciotomy in the treatment of lower extremity crush injuries remains controversial. Late fasciotomy wounds are known to be associated with sepsis and amputation. This report presents the results of a limb-saving treatment procedure for a patient with crushinduced leg compartment syndrome who had undergone fasciotomy before admission. A 36-year-old male patient, trapped under rubble for 37 hours, presented with purulent-necrotic drainage from the fasciotomy site of his right leg. Two radical muscle debridements were performed to excise all necrotic muscles. No signs of sepsis developed postoperatively, and renal function normalized with the aid of hemodialysis. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient was able to walk with the assistance of a walker. Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing showed a positive response to a 4.31-mm monofilament over the plantar aspect of the first metatarsal head; however, no sensation was detected in the dorsal aspect of the foot. This case highlights that radical muscle debridement may be considered a limb-preserving surgical option in patients with crush-induced leg compartment syndrome, as it can prevent sepsis, improve renal and metabolic function, and potentially obviate the need for amputation.

Indexed as

Compartment SyndromesCrush InjuriesCrush SyndromeDebridementLeg InjuriesLimb SalvageMuscle, SkeletalAdultEarthquakesFasciotomyHumansMaleSurvivorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40996148
PMCPMC12482963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.