ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Neighborhood enrichment for the identification of antigen-specific T-cell receptors.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- T Cell Thoughts.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding T-cell receptor (TCR) specificity is not only essential for fundamental research, but could open up novel avenues for diagnostics, cancer immunotherapy, and the targeted treatment of autoimmune diseases. The immune system responds to challenges through groups of T-cells with similar TCR sequences. In recent years, searching for TCRs with an enrichment of similar sequences - neighbors - in a TCR repertoire has become a standard procedure for antigen-specific TCR identification. This study provides a systematic comparison of computational algorithms-ALICE, TCRNET, GLIPH2, and tcrdist3-that leverage neighborhood enrichment for antigen-specific TCR identification. Using published murine datasets from Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection and novel datasets from Sputnik V vaccination and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection, we evaluated the performance of these algorithms. To facilitate reproducible analysis, we developed TCRgrapher, an R library that integrates these pipelines into a user-friendly framework. TCRgrapher enables efficient identification of antigen-specific TCRs from single repertoire snapshots and supports flexible parameter customization. Our comparative analysis revealed that ALICE and TCRNET consistently outperformed GLIPH2 and tcrdist3 across most datasets, achieving higher area under precision-recall curve. While murine datasets provide valuable insights into algorithm performance, caution is advised when extrapolating these results to other species or different experimental conditions. TCRgrapher is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/KseniaMIPT/tcrgrapher), offering researchers a robust tool for investigating TCR specificity and advancing immunological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.