ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2025
A bibliometric analysis of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology in high-impact global literature over a decade (2014-2023).
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of Italy's orthopaedics and Sports Medicine research output: Trends, impact, and comparative rankings (1996-2024).Journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the contributions and global impact of Turkish orthopedics and traumatology research published in high-impact international journals over the past decade (2014-2023). By examining article types, citation metrics, journal impact factors, and author a!liations, the aim was to highlight publication trends, strengths, and areas needing improvement within Turkish orthopedic research. Methods: Using the Web of Science database, keywords were searched under journal categories including "Orthopedics," "Orthopedics, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine," and "Sports Sciences." Articles from the top 40 orthopedic journals indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded were identified and selected based on their 2022 impact factors. Articles published between January 2014 and December 2023 with first authors a!liated with a Turkish institution were included. Citation density was calculated by dividing the total number of citations by the number of years since publication. Data extracted included publication type, citation count, citation density, research methodology, author a!liations, and institutional contributions. Results: Out of 70 279 articles published globally, 425 orthopedic articles with Turkish first authorship were identified in the selected journals. Most articles were clinical (88.7%), with the most frequent article types being case presentations (31.3%), retrospective cohort studies (17.9%), and laboratory research (11.3%). The least common types were expert opinions, epidemiological studies, and meta-analyses. The majority of articles appeared in Spine Journal (34.6%) and Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (27.3%), with no articles published in the highest-ranked journal (British Journal of Sports Medicine). Spine surgery was the leading subfield (29.9%), followed by sports, shoulder, and elbow surgery (22.6%) and reconstructive surgery (16%). Orthopedic specialists comprised 56% of first authors, with multicenter studies representing 65.4% of the articles. Public institutions accounted for 80.1% of published articles, while private institutions contributed 19.9%. A total of 356 articles were cited 8349 times, with a median citation number of 9 per article. Mean citation density was highest in meta-analysis (8.5 citation/year), epidemiological studies (8.3 citation/year), and randomized controlled trials (7.8 citation/ year), while lowest in case presentations (0.3 citation/year), expert opinions (0.4 citation/year), and laboratory research (2.2 citation/year). Conclusion: Turkish orthopedic research has maintained a significant presence in top orthopedic journals, mostly through clinical studies, especially in spinal and sports injury subfields. Despite high publication volume, citation impact remains relatively lower. Future e"orts should encourage higher-impact study designs, international collaborations, and standardized research evaluations to enhance the global influence of Turkish orthopedic literature. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.