ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2025
Button-related finger injuries in textile workers: the hidden danger of the industry.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate button-related injuries, which are increasingly common in the textile and apparel manufacturing sector, to contribute to diagnosis and treatment and to raise awareness among employers and workers. Methods: This retrospective study included 23 patients with button-related injuries. The study evaluated patient demographics, the department they presented to, the level of hand injury, accompanying pathologies (osseous, neurological, vascular, and tendinous injuries), tetanus immunization status, occupational health and safety training status, awareness of workplace physicians, prior awareness of such injuries, history of occupational accidents, and long-term outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v21. Descriptive data were summarized as frequency (%) or mean ± SD, and the Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality. Results: Among the 23 patients (14 males, 9 females), 16 sustained injuries to the distal phalanx and pulp level, while 7 had injuries at the middle phalanx level. At presentation, 4 patients exhibited hypoesthesia on the a!ected side of the finger, and 9 patients had reduced blood flow. Two patients had accompanying phalanx fractures. No tendinous pathologies were observed in any of the patients. All patients underwent surgical intervention. Seven patients developed nail deformities in the follow-up. Conclusion: Timely intervention and appropriate treatment after an injury are crucial for limb salvage and functionality. In long-term follow-ups, most patients healed without major complications; however, some the patients developed nail deformities. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.