ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Clinical implementation of intensity modulated proton therapy for testicular seminoma.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWe have previously shown that proton therapy results in considerable reduced doses to abdominal organs at risk (OAR) which likely reduces the patient's risk of a second malignant tumor, which is vital for this young population with favourable prognosis. Here, we present dosimetric results after implementing intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) as a national standard for seminoma. Patient/material and methods: Thirty patients with stage IIA and IIB (< 3 cm) seminoma were treated with five-field robustly multi-field optimised (MFO) proton therapy to 20-24 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) to the dog-leg retroperitoneal volume followed by a boost of 10-16 Gy (RBE) to the nodal metastasis. Control CTs were performed routinely, and target coverage evaluated. A standard two cone-beam CT (CBCT) set-up strategy with four match structures was developed, enabling implementation of a standard adaptive scheme.
resultsThe median clinical target volume (CTV-E) length in the craniocaudal direction was 26.9 cm, with a median volume of 551.4 cm3. Target coverage V95% = 100% for the nominal plan and V95% ≥ 98% for worst-case scenarios were fulfilled for all treatment plans and the 46 recalculated plans on control CTs. Kidney V17Gy was 0-6% and mean kidney dose 0-6 Gy across all plans. Bowel bag V15Gy was 194-698 cm3. All other OAR showed low doses. Four patients had replans (1-2 per patient). The median time for our image guidance (IG) strategy was 14:07 min across all patients with two CBCTs.
interpretationWe have established a robust setup for treatment planning, IG strategy, treatment delivery and adequate response to replanning. Therefore, we suggest considering IMPT for testicular seminoma whenever available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.