ArticlemAbs2025
iBody-mediated tuning of synthetic cytokine receptor activation via rational nanobody interface engineering.
Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The past, present, and future of anti-idiotype antibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanobodies are small, single-domain antibody fragments derived from heavy chain-only antibodies. They combine high binding affinity with advantages such as compact size, stability, solubility, and flexible epitope recognition, making them attractive tools in molecular biology and therapeutic applications. In this study, we engineered and optimized nanobodies for controlled activation of synthetic cytokine receptors, aiming to expand options for receptor customization. Specifically, we used nanobodies as extracellular domains of the gp130 receptor to induce dimerization upon antigen binding. To enable receptor activity, we introduced framework mutations that promote the formation of an i-shaped nanobody (iBody) dimer, adapted from i-shaped antibodies. These mutations enhanced dimerization and enabled low-level ligand-independent receptor activation. AlphaFold modeling identified the key amino acids responsible for forming the iBody interface. Additional modifications reduced intermolecular affinity, thereby minimizing background activation while preserving the structural features necessary for ligand-induced stimulation. This approach effectively broadened the receptor's activation range. Importantly, these framework mutations were not limited to the gp130-specific nanobody GP11 but were also functional in AIP3, an anti-idiotypic nanobody targeting palivizumab. Here, the modified nanobody fusion receptor could be activated by palivizumab, overcoming prior steric hindrance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.