Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995946›Full record

ArticleVeterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association2025

Radiation Exposure During Contrast-Enhanced Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies in Dogs and Cats.

Kathleen M Lehman, Savannah R Saboda, Kim R Love, Kursten V Pierce

Abstract readObservational Study, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Radiation Exposure During Contrast-Enhanced Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies in Dogs and Cats.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathleen M LehmanNorth Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Savannah R SabodaNorth Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Kim R LoveQuantitative Consulting and Collaboration, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Kursten V PierceNorth Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopic swallow studies are considered the gold standard diagnostic for determining underlying etiologies of dysphagia. Swallow studies are commonly performed procedures utilizing fluoroscopy in which personnel are exposed to ionizing radiation. The study objective was to document radiation exposure to individual personnel involved in performing gastrointestinal swallow studies in dogs and cats, compare radiation exposure based on the localization of disease, and evaluate radiation exposure based on the experience (i.e., year of training) of the diagnostic imaging resident. This prospective observational study population was comprised of 61 client-owned animals, 58 dogs and 3 cats, presenting to a university teaching hospital over 8 months. Dose was evaluated for positions/roles: position 1 (personnel feeding/at patient head), position 2/3 (restraining), and position 4 (image acquisition). Patient characteristics, diagnosis(es), fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and personnel positions were recorded. A linear mixed effects model was utilized for statistical analysis. Radiation dose based on anatomic disease location (e.g., cricopharyngeal, esophageal, gastroesophageal, none) was not statistically significant (p = .438). Th effect of personnel position (p < .001) and fluoroscopy time (p = .005) was statistically significant. The lowest median radiation dose was for personnel acquiring images (position 4), estimated at 16.38 µSv. The highest median radiation dose was for personnel feeding patients (position 1), estimated at 48.13 µSv. Unsurprisingly, personnel positioned closer to the radiation source during contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopic swallow studies were exposed to higher radiation doses. Personnel should be aware of this occupational hazard. Rotation of personnel roles (e.g., feeding, restraining, image acquisition) should be considered to limit dose to specific personnel.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesDeglutition DisordersDog DiseasesRadiation ExposureAnimalsCatsContrast MediaDeglutitionDogsFemaleFluoroscopyHumansMaleOccupational ExposureProspective StudiesRadiation DosageContrast MediafluoroscopyGI swallow studyionizing radiationradiation safety

Identifiers

PMID40995946
PMCPMC12462226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.