ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society2025
Oral Cephalexin Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment Analysis in Infants 7-60 Days Old.
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are limited data to guide oral antibiotic dosing in neonates and young infants, particularly for intravenous (IV) to oral transition. Cephalexin is a promising oral treatment for neonatal pathogens, including Enterobacterales and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). However, maturational changes in gastrointestinal absorption and kidney function during early infancy complicate extrapolation of dosing from older populations. We evaluated cephalexin pharmacokinetics and simulated dosing strategies to achieve pharmacodynamic targets in infants ≤60 days old.
methodsThis prospective, single-center study enrolled infants 0-60 days receiving cephalexin either as part of routine clinical care or as a single 25 mg/kg study dose. Plasma concentrations were analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Simulations assessed the probability of target attainment for free time above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT > MIC) for ≥ 50% and ≥ 70% of the dosing interval across MICs 1-16 mg/L, assuming 10% protein binding. We also simulated the cumulative fractional response using typical MIC distributions for Enterobacterales and MSSA.
resultsThe analysis included 144 samples from 33 infants with median post-natal age 31 days (range 9-56) and median gestational age 37 weeks (range 29-41). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and lag time best described the data. Weight influenced apparent volume of distribution and apparent clearance. Additionally, we identified a maturational effect on absorption rate using post-natal age and on apparent clearance using post-menstrual age. For Enterobacterales, 25 mg/kg/dose every 6 h achieved >90% cumulative fractional response for a 50% fT > MIC target. For MSSA, 25 mg/kg/dose every 8 h was sufficient. Higher or more frequent dosing was required to meet the more stringent 70% fT > MIC target.
conclusionsOral cephalexin can achieve necessary pharmacodynamic targets in infants 7-60 days old. These findings support the use of model-informed dosing strategies to guide safe and effective oral antibiotic use in early infancy, including for IV-to-oral transition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.