ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
Development and Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Platform for Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a patient-reported outcomes registry for patients with brain tumours (BEACON).ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Platform for Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes are not routinely collected in paediatric radiation therapy (RT). This study co-designed and evaluated an electronic platform to support routine HRQoL assessment using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
methodsA digital platform was developed following a user-centred design approach. Development included planning with consumers and clinicians, identifying user needs through interviews and iterative design refinements. Alpha testing was performed with consumers. Beta testing involved directed tasks by children, parents and clinician participants to evaluate the developed platform. Thematic analysis of participant feedback was performed to identify refinements and shape clinical implementation strategies.
resultsIterative alpha testing with end-users led to significant improvements in functionality and aesthetics. Beta testing involved 18 participants, including seven healthcare professionals, seven children and four parents. All participants successfully navigated the platform, completed tasks and interpreted PROM results. Participants described the platform as intuitive and child-friendly. Challenges included minor navigation issues on mobile devices. Suggestions for improvement included streamlined result visualisation and enhancements to the instructional material. Whilst parents and clinicians recognised the value of allowing parents to view their child's PROM results, considerations to ensure sensitivity were described.
conclusionThe electronic PROM platform was successfully developed to support HRQoL assessment of children undergoing RT. Future research is needed to evaluate the feasibility, usability and acceptability in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.