ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2025
A method for predicting enzyme substrate specificity residues using homologous sequence information.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications and limitations of AI tools in enzyme design.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
- Context-dependent peptide recognition shapes tyrosine kinase substrate specificity beyond consensus motifs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A method for predicting enzyme substrate specificity residues using homologous sequence information.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying amino acid residues that are critical for the catalytic function of enzymes is essential for elucidating reaction mechanisms, facilitating drug discovery, and advancing protein engineering. However, experimentally and computationally distinguishing residues that maintain structural integrity from those directly involved in enzymatic function remains a major challenge. In this study, we developed a methodology to identify amino acid residues that influence substrate specificity in enzymes with homologous structures. We framed the sequence comparison as a classification problem, treating each residue as a feature, thereby enabling the rapid and objective identification of key residues responsible for functional differences. To validate the proposed method, we applied it to three enzyme pairs-trypsin/chymotrypsin, adenylyl cyclase/guanylyl cyclase, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/malate dehydrogenase (MDH). The results confirmed the accurate prediction of previously identified specificity-determining residues. Furthermore, we conducted experiments on the LDH/MDH pair and successfully introduced mutations into key residues to alter substrate specificity, enabling LDH to utilize oxaloacetate while maintaining its expression levels. These findings demonstrate the potential of this method for efficiently identifying residues that govern substrate specificity. We have further developed this approach into a practical tool, the EZSCAN: Enzyme Substrate-specificity and Conservation Analysis Navigator (https://ezscan.pe-tools.com/), which enables rapid identification of amino acid residues critical for enzyme function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.