ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Assessing the Impact of Imaging Parameters on MRI Measurement of Kidney T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the Impact of Imaging Parameters on MRI Measurement of Kidney TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundT PURPOSE: To compare four T STUDY TYPE: Phantom and prospective in vivo assessments.
participantsISMRM/NIST and QASPER phantoms; 8 healthy volunteers (4 female, 30 ± 8 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, spin echo-echo planar imaging (SE-EPI), multi-echo-spin echo (ME-SE), Gradient and Spin Echo (GraSE) vendor-provided sequences, and custom T ASSESSMENT: T STATISTICAL TESTS: Shapiro-Wilk, Wilcoxon signed-rank, Student's t-test, Coefficient of Variation, Pearson's correlation coefficient, linear mixed effect model. p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsSE-EPI, ME-SE, GraSE, and T DATA
conclusionTo reduce B EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.