Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995822›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

A wind-tunnel gust generator for soaring birds and small UAVs.

Matthew Penn, George Yi, Simon Watkins, Shane P Windsor, Abdulghani Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew PennSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-5554-0158
George YiSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Simon WatkinsSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5550-4941
Shane P WindsorUniversity of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-4497
Abdulghani MohamedSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9592-1034

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA2386-22-1-0076Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-19-1-7017Australian GovernmentDefence Science and Technology GroupDefence Science InstitueDefence Science InstituteDefence Science Technology GroupNATONorth Atlantic Treaty Organization RTO AVT-347RMIT UniversityUS Air Force Office for Scientific Research FA2386-22-1-0076US Air Force Office for Scientific Research FA9550-19-1-7017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The operation of small uncrewed aerial vehicles (SUAVs) is limited by their inability to maintain steady flight trajectories in gusty conditions. Birds, however, regularly fly in the same gusty conditions with apparent ease. The mechanisms birds use to maintain steady flight in these conditions are not well understood. A wind-tunnel gust generator was developed to produce vertical and rolling gusts to perturb soaring birds so that their gust responses may be studied. The gust generator was located downstream of the birds and modified the strength of the updraft in which the birds soared. An example downward step gust, upward step gust and rolling pulse gust were characterised to demonstrate the gust generator's performance. The gusts were highly repeatable and resulted in changes of effective angle of attack of up to 20 deg, in periods of 0.2 s. Nankeen kestrels (Falco cenchroides) successfully soared above the operational gust generator, demonstrating its potential for use in future studies.

Indexed as

FalconiformesFlight, AnimalUnmanned Aerial DevicesWindAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaAvian flightBioinspirationGlidingGust mitigationSUAV

Identifiers

PMID40995822
PMCPMC12633735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.