ReviewSmall methods2026
Multi-Channel Neural Interface for Neural Recording and Neuromodulation.
Review in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Bioelectronic Neural Interfaces: From Material Design to Closed-Loop Systems.Small methods · 2026Article
- The Axon as a Self-Modifying Computational System: Autonomous Inference, Adaptive Propagation, and AI-Enabled Mechanistic Insight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multi-Channel Neural Interface for Neural Recording and Neuromodulation.Small methods · 2026Review
- Effect of Ultrasonic Treatment of Dispersed Carbon Nanocomposite Media on the Formation, Electrical Conductivity, and Degradation of a Hydrogel for Metallic Stimulation Electrodes.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural interfaces have emerged as pivotal platforms for advancing digital neurotherapies by enabling the real-time acquisition and monitoring of neural signals. Traditional single-channel systems are inherently limited in their capacity to capture the complex and large-scale interactions among diverse neuronal populations. In contrast, multi-channel systems provide the high spatiotemporal resolution necessary to decode the dynamic activity of neural circuits across multiple brain and spinal cord regions. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in multi-channel neural interface technologies, encompassing both penetrating and non-penetrating systems for high-resolution electrophysiological recording, as well as multifunctional platforms that integrate additional modalities such as drug delivery, optical stimulation, and chemical sensing. Recent progress in this field has been driven by advances in structural and material design, including the development of soft, flexible architectures and materials for both substrates and electrodes, which improve long-term stability and minimize tissue damage. In parallel, emerging data analysis techniques have enhanced the capacity to decode complex neural activity patterns from high-dimensional, multi-channel recordings. These technological advancements have broadened the potential applications of neural interfaces in brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), facilitating precise neuromodulation, real-time monitoring of neurological states, and integration with immersive systems such as virtual and augmented reality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.