ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Prospective inter-individual analysis of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in brain tumor patients: A comprehensive assessment of health preferences.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospective inter-individual analysis of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in brain tumor patients: A comprehensive assessment of health preferences.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eloquent intracranial tumors, whether primary or secondary, are located in brain regions critical for language, motor, or sensory function. In neuro-oncology, evaluating treatment outcomes requires more than survival analysis alone. Quality-adjusted life years combine survival and quality of life, based on numerical health preference values reflecting how patients perceive specific health states. However, such data are lacking for patients with eloquent tumors. In this prospective, single-center cohort study (2016-2019), patients with eloquent brain tumors underwent standardized assessments at four time points: preoperative, postoperative, and at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Instruments included Time Trade-Off (TTO), Standard Gamble, EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Patients indicated how many years from a 10-year life span they would trade to live in perfect health, including for hypothetical deficits like hemiparesis, aphasia, or dependency. The resulting values (range 0-1) were calculated and analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-tests. Preoperatively, 78 patients reported high quality of life (TTO median 0.9). EQ-5D index declined significantly after surgery (p < .05), while TTO and BDI scores remained stable, reflecting a deterioration in health. At 3 months (n = 23), dependency was rated as less severe compared to preoperative (p = .055; TTO 0.2 vs. 0.5), suggesting psychological adaptation. By 6 months (n = 8), health perceptions improved, indicating resilience (TTO 0.7 vs. 0.6 at 3 months). This is the first study to quantify health preferences in patients with eloquent brain tumors. While postoperative health status initially declines, resilience and adaptation occur over time, emphasizing the need for tailored postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.