ArticleEuropean endodontic journal2025
SEM Analysis and Pulp Tissue Dissolution Following Retrograde Preparation and Irrigation in Surgical Endodontics: A Novel Approach.
Article in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transfrenular Single-Incision (TrSI) Flaps: A Modified Minimally Invasive Technique That Optimizes Aesthetic Outcomes in Maxillary Central Incisor Apicoectomy-Technique Description and Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Guided Drilling, Partially Guided Trephination, and Fully Guided Trephination Within a Static Surgical Guide for Apicoectomy in Hard Bone: An In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel retrograde irrigation protocol involving ultrasonic activation, compared with conventional techniques, using two complementary experimental models.
methodsExperiment 1: Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were endodontically prepared, obturated, and randomly assigned to three groups (n=20): Group 1 (saline irrigation), Group 2 (ultrasonically activated 17% EDTA gel and 5.25% NaOCl gel), and Group 3 (no irrigation). Following 1 mm apical resection and 3 mm retrograde cavity preparation, rootend cleanliness was assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Three calibrated, blinded examiners evaluated smear layer and debris scores. Experiment 2: A 3d-printed artificial canal system with lateral extensions containing bovine pulp tissue was used to simulate organic material. Groups received: Group 1 (saline), Group 2 (ultrasonically activated 5.25% NaOCl gel), Group 3 (no irrigation). Pulp dissolution was measured using a high-precision analytical microbalance. Data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc (Experiment 1), and one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD (Experiment 2). A significance level of p<0.05 was adopted.
resultsIn Experiment 1, Group 2 showed significantly lower debris and smear layer scores than Groups 1 and 3 (p<0.001). In Experiment 2, only Group 2 achieved complete pulp tissue dissolution (p<0.001).
conclusionUltrasonically activated EDTA and NaOCl gel significantly enhance cleaning efficacy and organic tissue dissolution in retrograde endodontic surgery, allowing for a more conservative apical resection approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.