Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995668›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Rethinking the AI Paradigm for Solubility Prediction of Drug‑Like Compounds with Dual-Perspective Modeling and Experimental Validation.

Qilin Zhu, Yuxin Qiu, Guzhong Chen, Wenyao Chen, Xiang Zhang, Zhiwen Qi, Xuezhi Duan, De Chen, Zhen Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qilin ZhuState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Yuxin QiuState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Guzhong ChenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Wenyao ChenState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Xiang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Zhiwen QiState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Xuezhi DuanState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.
De ChenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 7034, Norway.
Zhen SongState Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9219-1833

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFA1510302National Natural Science Foundation of China 22208098National Natural Science Foundation of China 22278134National Natural Science Foundation of China 22578115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aqueous solubility is a crucial property for drug development, as it not only influences the drug delivery process but also determines the bioavailability of drugs. However, solubility prediction remains a formidable challenge, even after decades of research. Most previously-reported machine learning (ML) models generalize poorly on external sets due to the vast chemical space of drug compounds. In this report, the largest aqueous solubility dataset of drug and drug-like molecules so far is compiled, based on which reliable models for drug solubility prediction are developed by comparative modelling with assorted regression and classification algorithms. Under current circumstances, even advanced deep learning models are found less accurate than the stacking of multiple statistical ML algorithms due to data limitation. Analysis of applicability domain further verifies the generalization capability of the models for the drug domain, based on which the entries without experimental solubility in the DrugBank database are populated and categorized. Finally, the solubility of ten potential drug molecules is experimentally determined for the first time, again revealing the high reliability of our models. Hence, this work is believed to provides a comprehensive benchmark for future solubility prediction models and a powerful tool to guide new drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMachine LearningAlgorithmsDrug DevelopmentPharmaceutical PreparationsSolubilityPharmaceutical Preparationsapplicability domainartificial intelligencedrug discoverydual‐perspective modeling

Identifiers

PMID40995668
PMCPMC12697872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.