ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
Factors Influencing the Availability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Japan.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting the Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing "Availability" After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Methodological and Data Considerations.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Systemic Hurdles, Not Cardiologist Awareness: The Barriers to CPET Availability in Japan.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing the Availability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Japan.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the implementation rate of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), as well as the associated factors, using real-world data. Methods and Results: Data from the Diagnostic Procedure Combination System in Japan (2014-2018) was analyzed. The participants were cardiac patients who underwent CRT or CRT-D device implantation ( Conclusions: The CPET implementation after CRT or CRT-D was low. Emphasizing the importance of CPET may improve these rates. Future studies should explore strategies to increase its use in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.