Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995614›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in education2025

Assessment of key interviewing factors for research assistants (AKIRA): development of a novel training and evaluation competency-based tool for mental health data collection in community settings.

Alejandra Cid-Vega, Chynere Best, Kendall Pfeffer, Manaswi Sangraula, Janus Wong, Wilfred Gwaikolo, James Caracoglia, Sauharda Rai, Adam D Brown, Brandon Kohrt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alejandra Cid-VegaDepartment of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, United States.
Chynere BestDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Center for Global Mental Health Equity, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Kendall PfefferDepartment of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, United States.
Manaswi SangraulaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Center for Global Mental Health Equity, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Janus WongDepartment of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, United States.
Wilfred GwaikoloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Center for Global Mental Health Equity, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
James CaracogliaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Center for Global Mental Health Equity, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Sauharda RaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Center for Global Mental Health Equity, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.
Adam D BrownDepartment of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, United States.
Brandon KohrtDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Center for Global Mental Health Equity, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

Restoring mental health through community-based psychological services in New York City (RECOUP-NY)R01MH127767 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KOHRT, BRANDON ALAN · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data quality is critical in mental health research, but variability in training among those collecting data can undermine research outcomes. In this context, the Assessment of Key Interviewing Factors for Research Assistants (AKIRA) emerges as a novel, competency-based framework specifically designed for interview-based mental health data collection. AKIRA systematically identifies and evaluates key interviewing behaviors across ten domains, highlighting areas of mastery, improvement, and potentially harmful practices. Emphasizing cross-cultural applicability, the tool adapts to diverse research settings, particularly where non-specialist data collectors play central roles. Global mental health services face significant challenges, with treatment rates for conditions such as depression alarmingly low, especially in lower-to-middle income countries. Such disparities underscore the urgent need for evidence-based, culturally sensitive interventions and robust monitoring systems to bridge gaps in mental health care. Despite the growing demand for high-quality data, there is a marked absence of systematic competency assessments for research assistants, contributing to variability and potential bias in data collection processes. AKIRA was developed through an iterative process involving literature reviews, adaptation of existing frameworks for competency assessment, and feedback from key informants. Its pilot testing and ongoing evaluation aim to refine its utility, ensuring that non-specialist data collectors are better prepared to engage with communities and conduct reliable, replicable research. By standardizing interview techniques and addressing the "interviewer effect," AKIRA not only enhances data quality but also facilitates ethical, culturally informed research practices. Future psychometric evaluations and cross-context adaptations, including implementations in the United States, Uganda, and Nepal, promise to further integrate this tool into mental health research infrastructures, ultimately supporting more effective program monitoring and improved mental health outcomes globally. Overall, AKIRA represents a transformative step in standardizing data collection competencies. Its broad adoption could enhance research quality, inform policy decisions, and ultimately contribute to reducing global mental health disparities at scale.

Indexed as

capacity buildingcompetency assessmentcross-culturalequityglobal mental healthmental health researchmonitoring and evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40995614
PMCPMC12456363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.