ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Step-by-Step Approach to the Incidental Diagnosis of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: Practical Insights.
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: update on endoscopic and surgical management].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Step-by-Step Approach to the Incidental Diagnosis of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: Practical Insights.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The incidental diagnosis of type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors (gNETs) has become increasingly frequent in clinical practice, largely due to the widespread use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and improved recognition of these lesions. Although typically indolent, type I gNETs require accurate assessment to ensure appropriate risk stratification, management, and follow-up. This review provides a practical, evidence-based guide specifically designed for gastroenterologists and clinicians managing patients with incidentally discovered type I gNETs. Methods: Structured in a step-by-step format, the review outlines key aspects of diagnosis and management, including endoscopic recognition and differential diagnosis, histological confirmation with a focus on corpus-restricted atrophic gastritis, initial risk assessment based on tumor characteristics and patient factors, and the use of additional imaging modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound, cross-sectional imaging, and functional imaging. Results: The review emphasizes the importance of referring patients to specialized centers for multidisciplinary evaluation, a strategy shown to improve clinical outcomes and adherence to best practices. Finally, practical recommendations for long-term surveillance are provided, with clear indications tailored to individual patient risk profiles. Conclusion: By integrating current guidelines with practical insights and highlighting critical decision points, this review serves as a concise, user-friendly tool to support clinicians in optimizing the care of patients with type I gastric NETs. This stepwise approach aims to bridge the gap between complex guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice, offering actionable guidance to ensure safe, effective, and standardized management of these increasingly encountered lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.