ReviewJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2025
Differences in Endoscopic Features of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma From a Clinicopathological Perspective.
Review in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differences in Endoscopic Features of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor and Neuroendocrine Carcinoma From a Clinicopathological Perspective.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare type of stomach cancer, classified into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Gastric NETs (G-NETs) originate from endocrine progenitor cells in the basal layer of the mucosa, primarily in the setting of chronic atrophic gastritis, such as autoimmune gastritis. They generally exhibit low malignancy and a favorable prognosis. By contrast, gastric NECs (G-NECs), a rare subtype of gastric cancers, arise from endocrine precursor cell clones that dedifferentiate in the deep portion of pre-existing differentiated-type adenocarcinomas. G-NECs are characterized by rapid growth, frequent lymphovascular invasion, high metastatic potential, and aggressive biological behavior. Most G-NEC cases are therefore diagnosed at advanced stages, often with lymph node or distant metastases, leading to a poorer prognosis than gastric adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, endoscopic diagnosis of G-NECs remains challenging because of the low sensitivity of biopsy-based techniques. While it is well established that G-NETs and G-NECs have distinct clinicopathological characteristics, information on their endoscopic features, particularly those observed with magnifying narrow-band imaging, remains limited. This review aims to summarize the characteristic endoscopic findings of G-NETs and G-NECs in relation to their clinicopathological findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.