Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995606›Full record

ArticleThe journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute2025

The clock-drawing test: reading temporalities of dementia from clinical chart notes.

Janelle S Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Janelle S TaylorUniversity of Toronto.

Funding

Translational pharmacoepidemiology: neuroprotection and neurotoxicity of antihypertensives and strong anticholinergicsU19AG066567 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHRISTOPHER DIRK KEENE · 2021 to 2026
$80.4M
Furthering scientific understanding of mechanisms underlying resilience to the effects of AD pathology by incorporating state of the art quantification of gliosis, inflammation, & synaptic toxicityU01AG006781 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, PAUL K, LARSON, ERIC B · 1986 to 2020
$39.3M
Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAR, CORINNE M · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
Health Outcomes for Patients with Dementia without Family CaregiversR21AG058056 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TAYLOR, JANELLE S · 2017 to 2018
$666k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG058056NIA NIH HHS U01 AG006781NIA NIH HHS U19 AG066567NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clock-drawing test, a cognitive screening test widely used clinically, is here taken as a window onto forms of temporality present in clinical encounters involving dementia. Drawing on close reading of clinical notes from their medical records, I offer imagistic silhouettes of three older adults in the Seattle area who had no living spouse or children when they developed dementia. Attending to temporality in these records brings clinical interactions into focus as part of the fundamental relationality of dementia, even as attending dementia highlights the fundamental relationality of time. The article examines how small-scale singularities of time in the clinic bear the imprint of collective temporal registers, including cultural expectations of the life course and larger histories of labour and medicine - and how dementia can unsettle these forms and layers of temporality. Both temporality and dementia alike, I argue, are thoroughly social, historical, and embodied phenomena, their disorientations tangled up together for the time being.

Identifiers

PMID40995606
PMCPMC12456299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.