Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995586›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Artificial intelligence based techniques for caries risk prediction and assessment: A scoping review.

Sonal Bhatia, Vinay Kumar Gupta, Sumit Kumar, Gaurav Mishra, Seema Malhotra, Khushboo Arif, Atrey Pai Khot, Aman Rajput, Angad Mahajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sonal BhatiaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vinay Kumar GuptaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sumit KumarDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Gaurav MishraDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Seema MalhotraCommunity Health Centre, Chinhat, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Khushboo ArifDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Atrey Pai KhotDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Aman RajputDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Angad MahajanDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically search through the evidence for the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) for caries risk assessment (CRA) or prediction (CRP), determine the scope of the methodologies used, summarize their performance metrics, and report limitations and challenges (if any). Design: A structured and comprehensive search of three electronic databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, was performed to yield results from 2013 to 2023. Studies were selected through title, abstract, and full-text screening based on the selection criteria. Charting of the extracted data was performed using a self-designed checklist with eight dimensions. Results: The electronic database search retrieved 3059 articles. Ultimately, 13 articles were included in the review. The most used methods were logistic regression (n = 9) and random forest (n = 8). The performance of the included models was measured variably. The reported performance metrics of the models were heterogeneous in nature; the sensitivity ranged from 0.59 to 0.996, while the specificity ranged from 0.531 to 0.943. The most frequently utilized predictors include socio-demographic factors, oral hygiene habits, and dietary habits. Conclusion: Of the AI-based CRA models analyzed, machine learning algorithms were most frequently used. This review highlights that AI methods most probably show superior specificity and better performance than traditional methods. The application of these algorithms can have significant implications for the population impacted by pertinent chronic diseases that are avoidable through risk reduction, such as dental caries.

Identifiers

PMID40995586
PMCPMC12455132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.