ArticleInternational journal of mental health and addiction2024
Technology-based substance use interventions for emerging adults and college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in International journal of mental health and addiction, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Health Belief Model Constructs and Self-Control with Drug Avoidance Intention Among University Students in the Republic of Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital health interventions for people who use methamphetamine: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize randomized controlled trial evidence on technology-based interventions' (TBIs) effectiveness for substance use among emerging adults (EA)/college students (CS). Methods: Nine electronic databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed evidence quality. We used robust variance estimation in meta-regression for effect size synthesis and moderator analysis. Results: Based on 130 studies, the overall between-group effect size was 0.23 (95% CI= 0.18, 0.28). The effect sizes for comparing TBIs with no treatment, standard care, and non-technology interventions were 0.25 (CI=0.19, 0.31), 0.23 (CI=0.15, 0.32), and 0.12 (CI= -0.02, 0.25), respectively. Older participants showed significantly larger effect sizes, and interventions using multiple technologies had larger effects than smartphone-based ones. Conclusion: TBIs are effective in reducing substance use in EA/CS, with outcomes comparable to non-technology interventions and advantages over no treatment and standard care. Future research should address drug-related outcomes, multi-technology approaches, age-appropriate designs, and cultural diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.