ArticleBMJ medicine2024
Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Article in BMJ medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of extended-release carbidopa-levodopa (IPX203) versus immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- The safety profile of subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's diseases: A systematic review of perioperative complications and psychological impacts.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's disease: an analysis of interim data for Romanian patients enrolled in the ELEGANCE study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of YouTube video resources concerning patient education for Parkinson's disease: An electronic media-based study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- The assessment of suicidality in psychiatric trials: a protocol for a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Antipsychotics for Parkinson's disease: a protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Neuromodulation in Neurodegenerative Disease: Precision in Chaos, Learning in Loss.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the benefits and harms of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Data sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and other sources, from inception to 9 May 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomised clinical trials of deep brain stimulation with antiparkinsonian drug treatment use versus antiparkinsonian drugs only (primary comparison, seven trials) for Parkinson's disease. Other comparisons were deep brain stimulation versus surgery with sham stimulation (three trials) and versus resective surgery (two trials). Results: Primary outcomes were all cause mortality, serious adverse events, and disease specific symptoms. In seven trials, 1125 participants were randomised to receive deep brain stimulation with antiparkinsonian drugs versus antiparkinsonian drugs only. All results had a high risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence was very low for all primary outcomes. Information size was insufficient for assessing all cause mortality (risk ratio 2.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 9.24; I Conclusions: The certainty of evidence was very low for all primary outcomes, and based on the included evidence, the beneficial effects were questionable because of methodological limitations. Compared with only antiparkinsonian drug treatment, deep brain stimulation with antiparkinsonian drugs seemed to increase the risk of serious adverse events, mainly because of perioperative complications and hardware related events. Conducting randomised clinical trials of adequate methodological quality to effectively evaluate the effects of deep brain stimulation is crucial. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022306556.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.