ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
EVALUATION OF ARTHROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF TRIANGULAR FIBROCARTILAGE.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment by wrist triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesions videoarthroscopy (VA) and analyze the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and intraoperative VA findings. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 28 patients undergoing VA from February 2021 to September 2023, selected by predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean age was 39.6 years (range: 20-58), with a mean follow-up of 13.6 months (6-20). Twelve surgeries (42.9%) were on the right wrist and sixteen (57.1%) on the left. Functional assessment used the 11-item Quick-Dash questionnaire. Results: Quick-Dash scores were excellent in 18 cases (64.3%), good in 7 (25.0%), and satisfactory in 3 (10.7%). MRI identified 4 (14.3%) extensive and 24 (85.7%) partial tears, while VA confirmed 2 (7.1%) extensive and 26 (92.9%) partial tears. Concordance between MRI and VA was found in 26 cases (92.9%). Conclusion: Surgical treatment by VA resulted in predominantly excellent functional outcomes. There was high agreement between MRI and VA findings, indicating good sensitivity and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.