ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
RELIABILITY OF A NEW BAROPODOMETRY PLATFORM DURING BAREFOOT WALKING IN HEALTHY ADULTS.
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To expand existing knowledge on gait parameters in a healthy population using a baropodometer and to ensure the reliability of the equipment. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with fifty healthy adults aged 24 to 65 years. Parameters were collected from both sides over at least five valid steps. The Wilcoxon test was performed, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for static and dynamic measurements was obtained with 95% confidence and a p-value of 0.005. Results: The platform's reliability exceeded 0.7 for all parameters, both in static and dynamic analysis. All parameters showed a difference of less than 10% compared to the mean estimate across the five tests performed. Discussion: The platform's reliability showed moderate to high ICC values, indicating that, under similar hardware and software conditions, platforms from different manufacturers may produce comparable results. The ICC for PTI was lower than that of the other variables, possibly due to physiological differences in posture, which affect gait speed. Conclusion: The HS Tecnology manufacturer's baropodometer is a reliable tool for gait analysis in barefoot healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.