Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995461›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

Functional MRI reveals subcortical auditory push-pull interactions requiring intercollicular integrity.

Frederico Severo, Mafalda Valente, Noam Shemesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frederico SeveroChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mafalda ValenteChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Noam ShemeshChampalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-5876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of subcortical structures in binaural integration is of great interest for auditory processing. The inferior colliculus (IC) is the main auditory midbrain center where ascending and descending auditory projections converge, which was suggested to encode auditory information via a push-pull mechanism (a coordinated antagonistic neural mechanism for adaptive response control) between the two ICs. However, the origin of this push-pull mechanism in the brain and how it interacts with other upstream/downstream subcortical areas are still a matter of great debate. Here, we harness functional MRI (fMRI) in combination with IC lesions in the rat to dissect the push-pull interaction from a pathway-wide perspective. We find evidence for the push-pull mechanism in IC through opposing negative/positive fMRI signals in the ipsilateral/contralateral ICs upon monaural stimulation. By unilaterally lesioning the corresponding contralateral IC, we demonstrate the necessity of collicular integrity and intercollicular interactions for the push-pull interaction. Using binaural stimulation and IC lesions, we show that the push-pull interaction is exerted also in binaural processing. Finally, we demonstrate that, at least at the population level revealed by fMRI, the main push-pull interactions occur first at the IC level, and not earlier, and that the outcome of the push-pull "calculation" is relayed downstream to the medial geniculate body (MGB). This dissection of the push-pull interaction sheds light into subcortical auditory function.

Indexed as

auditory push–pullfMRIinferior colliculusnegative BOLDsubcortical auditory processing

Identifiers

PMID40995461
PMCPMC12455056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.