ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2025
The Bell's test: a quantitative test evaluation of inattention and visuospatial neglect in the elderly.
Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bell's test, a cancellation task, permits a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of inattention and visual neglect. It was included in a neuropsychological assessment by Gauthier, Dehaut, and Joanette in 1989. It is a quick test that can detect visuospatial changes. Objective: To demonstrate the importance of Bell's test in elderly individuals without visuospatial complaints. To evaluate Bell's test in different levels of schooling, age groups, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Modified Mini-Mental State (MMMS) tests. Methods: A cross-sectional, randomized study was carried out on 278 elderly people, aged between 60 and 89 years old, with a mean age of 69.4 (±6.8 years standard deviation - SD). Among the participants, 73.9% of the females lived in Olinda City, Brazil. Age was stratified every five years between 60 and 89 years old, and schooling levels were categorized into four subgroups, ranging from illiterate to more than eight years old. Each participant underwent an analysis of age, sex, education, risk factors, MMSE, the modified MMMS, and Bell's test. Results: The correlation between the A and B errors and age was statistically significant; as age increases, the number of errors also increases. A near significant and strong correlation was observed in individuals aged above 84 and between 60 and 64. Correlation between MMSE, MMSM, and Bell's test showed a significant, moderate negative correlation. Conclusion: Increasing age worsens the results of the Bell test. The MMSE and the MMMS tests showed a direct relationship with the results of the Bell test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.