ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
Do we need internal medicine specialists in physical therapy? Recognizing the need for updating the clinical practice paradigm.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing demand for healthcare services and development of healthcare present an opportunity for expanding physical therapy roles into internal medicine. This perspective discusses the potential benefits and limitations of establishing a formal internal medicine specialization for physical therapists (PTs). While PTs already contribute significantly to chronic disease prevention and treatment, their current scope of practice lacks structured training in internal medicine domains such as metabolic, autoimmune, renal, and systemic inflammatory disorders. Integrating internal medicine into PT education and clinical practice could enhance early identification of red flags, embrace interdisciplinary collaboration, and improve non-pharmacological interventions for various internal medicine-related diseases. Nevertheless, this expansion must be approached with caution, ensuring clear scope definitions, adequate training, and collaborative implementation to mitigate risks such as role ambiguity or misdiagnosis. Drawing on global experiences from advanced practice models and emerging literature, this paper calls for a discussion on the feasibility, safety, and value of internal medicine specialization in physical therapy practice. The goal of this perspective is not to replace medical professionals but to augment chronic disease management through targeted evidence-based rehabilitation strategies and preventative approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.