ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
A Qualitative Study of Norwegian Care Institutions Health Care Workers' Experiences of Ad Hoc Ethical Reflection During the Workday.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The objective of the study was to explore experiences related to ad hoc ethical reflection and how ethical reflection might be structured. There has been limited research on the topic in the context of nursing homes and health care centres. Reflection is an ongoing practice in healthcare, often linked to problem-solving and clinical decision-making. Methods: The study has an exploratory design with a qualitative approach. The researchers conducted four group interviews. The data were analysed with systematic text condensation, which entails condensing meaning units following development of code groups. Results: When health care workers (registered nurses, auxiliary nurses, or care workers) encounter ethical uncertainty or ethical issues, they may perceive these situations as challenging. Occasionally, they take the initiative to conduct ad hoc ethical reflection, where they discuss different perspectives and make decisions collectively. Hence, ethical reflection contributes to collaboration. The structure of ad hoc ethical reflection appears to be shaped by two key components: problem-solving and consensus-building, while also addressing, to some extent, the values involved. Furthermore, ethical reflection often led to health care workers supporting each other. Conclusion: Ad hoc ethical reflection can improve decision-making and foster moral awareness among nursing home health care workers. Moreover, the study identifies a need to implement practices of ad hoc ethical reflection through training programs, such as simulation training. Future research, preferably observational, may provide deeper insight into the prerequisites, structure and performance of ad hoc ethical reflection, and how its conclusions are implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.