Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995394›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2025

Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma Versus Recurrent Invasive Ductal Carcinoma After Partial Mastectomy: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

Hidetoshi Satomi, Ayumi Ryu, Sei Murayama, Yuki Morimoto, Chiaki Kubo, Shigenori Nagata, Satoshi Tanada, Keiichiro Honma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hidetoshi SatomiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0400-280X
Ayumi RyuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.
Sei MurayamaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.
Yuki MorimotoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.
Chiaki KuboDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.
Shigenori NagataDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.
Satoshi TanadaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.
Keiichiro HonmaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology Osaka International Cancer Institute Chuo-ku Osaka Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postradiation angiosarcoma (PRAS) of the breast occurs after irradiation. It is categorized separately from primary angiosarcoma (PAS) in the 2019 World Health Organization classification of tumors. PRAS diagnosis is challenging owing to its occurrence in circumstances similar to breast cancer recurrence, thus complicating cytomorphological analysis. In Japan, breast-conserving therapy is prevalent, with postoperative radiation therapy often employed to mitigate recurrence risk. Given that the number of PRAS cases is anticipated to increase, further research and understanding of this tumor are imperative. Although cytomorphological studies have provided some insights into PAS, similar comprehensive data for PRAS are lacking. In this case study, we report a case of a female in her 50s with a mass detected 8 years postradiotherapy for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) initially suggested IDC recurrence; however, histological and immunohistochemical analyses confirmed PRAS. This case highlights the challenge of distinguishing PRAS from IDC owing to overlapping cytomorphological features. Notably, the absence of benign components and distinctive endothelial wrapping observed on FNAC and imprinting cytology were crucial for accurate diagnosis. These findings highlight key cytomorphological features for PRAS differentiation: high-grade tumor features with monotonous appearance and abundant stromal component, which are essential given its poor response to conventional treatments and increasing incidence owing to standard breast-conserving therapies. Furthermore, recognizing PRAS as a differential diagnosis for neoplasms emerging postradiotherapy is crucial.

Indexed as

angiosarcomacytomorphologyfine‐needle aspirationhistology

Identifiers

PMID40995394
PMCPMC12453951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.