ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Intraoperative optical coherence tomography in ophthalmology: Technologies and applications.
Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Real-time OCT-guided strategies for optimization of precision and safety in vitreoretinal surgery].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus internal limiting membrane removal in large macular hole with different hole edge configurations: a comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in optical coherence tomography: Celebrating its transformative impact on eye care.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) offers valuable real-time, depth-resolved visualization of ocular anatomy and during ophthalmic surgical maneuvers, which can be used to augment clinical decision-making, help verify surgical endpoints, enhance surgical precision, and facilitate the development of novel surgical techniques. Early iOCT demonstrations used perioperative devices, such as handheld and intraocular probes, which required pauses in surgery and disrupted clinical workflow. The advent of microscope-integrated systems addressed these limitations, allowing for iOCT imaging concurrent with surgical microscopy. iOCT image visualization has similarly progressed from external monitors, which require surgeons to divert their gaze, to heads-up displays integrated into microscope oculars, enabling direct overlays and improved ergonomics. Most recent advances have included increasing imaging speed to enable four-dimensional visualization of surgical dynamics and integration of automated surgical instrument tracking technologies. Clinical translation of iOCT has demonstrated utility across a range of procedures, including glaucoma surgery, corneal transplants, cataract extraction, vitrectomy, membrane peel, retinal detachment and macular hole repair, subretinal injection, and retinal prosthesis placement. As more advanced technologies are integrated into the conventional ophthalmic surgical workflow, iOCT has the potential to improve surgical performance and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.