Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40995301›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Epidural Blood Patch in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: A Case Series.

Ilaria Vittoria De Martini, Samuel N Rogers, Laurel Truscott, Hasan Ozgur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilaria Vittoria De MartiniRadiology and Imaging Science, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, USA.
Samuel N RogersRadiology and Imaging Science, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, USA.
Laurel TruscottPediatrics, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, USA.
Hasan OzgurRadiology and Imaging Science, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePost-dural puncture headaches (PDPH) are caused by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks that occur after a lumbar puncture (LP). Epidural blood patch (EBP) is an effective treatment option for patients with PDPH in whom conservative treatment fails. Special consideration has to be taken if the patient is affected by any hematological malignancy, due to the fact that EBP carries a theoretical risk of seeding the malignancy into the neuroaxis. The frequent occurrence of immunocompromised status and thrombocytopenia in this patient population warrants individual assessment prior to decision-making. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate that EBP is a safe treatment option if used in the right clinical setting. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn our study, we report the imaging and clinical findings of five patients with hematologic malignancies who developed PDPH following LP. All patients failed to respond to conservative treatment and required EBP.

resultsThe EBP was successfully performed in all five patients. The preprocedural brain and spine MRI findings were concerning for CSF leak, demonstrating subdural fluid collections, pachymeningeal enhancement, and brain sagging. All patients responded favorably to EBP with the resolution of symptoms. In the long-term follow-up, none of them developed postprocedural infections or neuroaxis tumor seeding. Thrombocytopenia did not result in failure of the procedure or any bleeding complications.

conclusionEBP is effective in treating conservative therapy-refractory PDPH in a patient population with underlying hematologic malignancies. Due to the increased risks of infection in the setting of immunosuppression, compromised coagulation status related to underlying malignancy, and possible tumor seeding to the neuroaxis, the procedure and possible associated risks should be discussed thoroughly with the patient and family. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: We noticed in our practice that there is a lack of deep understanding of a specific patient population affected by hematologic malignancies developing postdural puncture headaches after an LP. As of today, there are no well-established guidelines regarding this specific situation, and every proceduralist has to make a decision whether they feel comfortable performing an EBP when conservative treatment fails, with the possible risk of disease spreading, infection, and bleeding. With our paper, we offered insights into our practice and results, and hope to serve as a helpful resource for proceduralists who are facing a similar clinical setting.

Indexed as

epidural blood patchhematologic malignancieslumbar puncturelumbar puncture needlepost-dural puncture headache

Identifiers

PMID40995301
PMCPMC12456975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.