ArticleCureus2025
Urachal Mucinous Cystic Tumour of Low Malignant Potential: A Case Report With Literature Review.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urachal mucinous cystic tumours of low malignant potential (MCTLPs) are exceedingly rare epithelial tumours. MCTLPs arise from the remnants of the urachus and are characterised by the presence of intestinal-type mucinous epithelium with low-grade cytologic atypia without stromal invasion, which differentiates them from mucinous adenocarcinomas. These tumours are often asymptomatic and found incidentally on imaging done for other reasons; symptoms, however, may include mild abdominal pain/discomfort, storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or mucusuria. The treatment is surgical excision, which carries favourable cure rates. We hereby present a case of a 38-year-old man who had an incidental finding of an intravesical cystic lesion on ultrasound done as part of the work-up for newly diagnosed hypertension. The only symptom the patient described in hindsight was an occasional discharge of a gelatinous material in his urine. His work-up also included a diagnostic flexible cystoscopy and a computerised tomography (CT) scan with a delayed urographic phase, which confirmed the finding of a urachal cyst. Histopathological examination following surgical excision confirmed the presence of a rare low-grade urachal MCTLP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.