ArticleCureus2025
Emotional Intelligence Among Physicians of Different Specialties in Jordan.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to a set of abilities that enable individuals to recognize and understand emotions, regulate their own responses, maintain motivation, and effectively manage interpersonal interactions. EI plays a crucial role in a physician's daily practice. Higher EI has been linked to reduced burnout, stronger rapport with patients, improved communication skills, and other professional benefits. Methodology Using a cross-sectional observational design, 100 residents and physicians working at the University of Jordan Hospital in 2021 completed a questionnaire that included the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) to assess global EI and its subscales. Results The mean global trait EI was 4.89 ± 0.80. A significant association was found between EI and medical specialty (p = 0.015). Psychiatrists had the highest mean global trait EI, while general surgeons had the lowest. Higher global trait EI was also positively associated with being a specialist. In addition, global trait EI correlated positively with salary, age, and job satisfaction. Conclusions The study identified several factors that may influence physicians' EI levels. Specialty appears to be an important determinant of EI, whereas gender did not predict EI. Further research is needed to explain these findings and to contribute to a broader understanding of EI, both in general and within the context of the doctor-patient relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.